If you are an exclusive contributor to iStockphoto (or another agency with an exclusivity program), this might be relevant to you. Earlier this month I mentioned the photo book competition hosted by print-on-demand service Blurb. I love the idea of this and would very much like to take part, even if I would give myself little to no chance of actually winning.
Before jumping in however, I thought it wise to first clear it with iStockphoto. As an exclusive photographer with iStock, I can still do work for hire and charity work, but I cannot give my photos away with a royalty free license. Unfortunately, as stated in a reply from iStock support, that includes this contest. As part of the contest rules, I would be giving Blurb royalty free rights to use my work for promoting the competition, and that is a no-no.
This is the first time, I have ever encountered a bump in the road as a result of my exclusivity with iStockphoto (I joined when the program first launched), and though it is somewhat frustrating and a bit of an inspirationkiller, to be honest, it doesn't bother me too much. After all, the higher royalty from sales at iStock, due to my exclusivity there, is a pretty good deal and I can still make as many photography books as I want — just not as part of this competition.
The lesson learned is: Always double-check with your agency and/or any existing contracts, before entering into competitions or similar arrangements.
Rasmus Rasmussen is on loan from iStockphoto, where he is part of the image inspection team.
